In the quest for economic stability, few challenges loom larger than inflation. The phenomenon, when left unchecked, erodes purchasing power, disrupts investment climates, and hampers the ability of individuals and businesses alike to plan for the future. For Nigeria, a nation endowed with abundant potential, managing inflation has become a critical endeavor. In the wake of 2023, the rate of inflation climbed above 20% for the first time since the turn of the century calling for concerted efforts to stem the increase in a bid to achieve economic growth and stability. While the CBN has met the challenge with tighter monetary policies and higher borrowing rates, the surge in price continues its upward momentum unabated. The article challenges the effect of the CBN strategies and recommends modern solutions with success stories from some similarly developing countries.

A Historical Perspective

Since the turn of the millennium, Nigeria has witnessed a fluctuating tapestry of inflation trends. In the early 2000s, single-digit figures prevailed, reflecting a relatively stable economic environment. However, subsequent years witnessed greater volatility, with inflation rates experiencing peaks and troughs, as illustrated in Figure 1. Notably, 2005 marked a significant spike, registering at an alarming 17.86%.

The Inflationary Surge of 2023

Yet, it is the recent chapter in Nigeria’s inflation saga that demands our keen attention. As we stepped into the year 2023, inflation rates surged at an unprecedented pace, breaching the 20% mark within the first quarter. This upward trajectory gained even greater momentum in June, following the decisive policy shift with the removal of fuel subsidies and the unification of the exchange rate. By August, the inflation rate had surged to 25.80%, culminating in an annual average that eclipsed previous records.

Unearthing the Catalysts

This remarkable surge demands a closer examination of the underlying causes. In June of the same year, a pivotal policy shift occurred, as fuel subsidies were dismantled and the exchange rate was unified. These decisions, while aimed at rationalizing economic policies, inadvertently stoked the flames of inflation. The subsequent months bore witness to an accelerated rise in the inflation rate, underscoring the delicate balance between economic reform and its unintended consequences.

As we stand at this juncture, it is imperative for policymakers to critically reassess the toolkit at their disposal. The conventional approach of adjusting the monetary policy rate has proven insufficient in the face of these unprecedented circumstances. It is high time for a paradigm shift, one that embraces creative and unconventional measures to curb inflation, safeguard economic stability, and pave the way for sustainable growth in Nigeria.

Inflation Management Methodology and its Impact: The Monetary Policy Rate (MPR)

Central to Nigeria’s efforts in inflation management has been the strategic use of the Monetary Policy Rate (MPR). The Monetary Policy Rate (MPR), often hailed as a cornerstone of inflation control, has been a focal point in Nigeria’s economic policy toolkit.

In theory, adjusting the MPR allows policymakers to influence borrowing costs, manage the money supply, and subsequently regulate inflation. However, the real-world application of this approach has recently come under scrutiny, with the outcomes casting a shadow of doubt over its effectiveness.

As we venture deeper into this analysis, let us consider the historical trend of the MPR and its correlation with inflation rates. To gain a holistic perspective, Figure 2 offers a visual representation of this intricate relationship.

2000-2022: The data from 2000 to 2022 unveils a series of fluctuations in both MPR and inflation rates. Throughout this period, the MPR remained dynamic, occasionally responding to inflationary pressures. Yet, the efficacy of this approach appears to have waned, as inflation rates displayed a certain resilience, often defying the desired restraint.

2023: As we step into the year 2023, a pertinent shift becomes evident. While the MPR was adjusted several times during the year, inflation continued its upward spiral with no signs of abating. January witnessed an MPR adjustment to 17.5%, and inflation soared to 21.82%. March saw another MPR adjustment to 18.0%, and inflation reached 22.04%. By May, an MPR of 18.5% did little to contain inflation, which had surged to 22.41%. July witnessed the MPR rise to 18.75%, but inflation showed no signs of relenting, reaching a staggering 24.08% by that time. The subsequent MPR adjustments appeared inconsequential in stemming the inflationary tide.

Notable Observations: The data and graph indicate that, in the context of recent inflation trends in Nigeria, the traditional reliance on MPR adjustments to control inflation has faced reduced effects. The MPR’s impact on inflation appears to be less direct and less effective, with inflationary pressures largely persisting despite these measures.

Insights into MPR’s Shortcomings MPR adjustment is a widely accepted strategy for Inflation management among countries of the world with proved success. However, the effectiveness the MPR, like any other policy, is dependent on the state and structure of the economy. The effectiveness of the measure in Nigeria is reduced for one or more of the following reasons;

•  Global Influence: External factors, like oil price fluctuations and geopolitical events, significantly impact domestic inflation. The MPR’s domestic focus may not fully address these global forces.
•   Structural Challenges: Nigeria’s heavy reliance on oil revenue and infrastructure deficits create supply-side pressures. These issues extend beyond the immediate scope of the MPR.
• Fiscal-Monetary Alignment: Effective coordination between monetary and fiscal policies is crucial. Inconsistencies can undermine the MPR’s influence on inflation. Sometimes expansionary monetary/fiscal policies do exist at the same time as contractionary MPR stance in the country.
• Time Lag in Impact: Changes in the MPR may take time to affect the economy, limiting its effectiveness in a rapidly changing environment.
• Inflation Expectations: Public perceptions of future inflation can become self-fulfilling. Managing these expectations goes beyond the MPR’s sc
• Supply-Side Focus: Addressing root causes like energy and food prices requires policies beyond traditional monetary tools.
• Fuel Subsidy Removal and Exchange Rate Unification: These transformative measures have significantly impacted inflation dynamics, potentially influencing the MPR’s efficacy.

Exploring Global Strategies for Inflation Management

In the quest to tackle rising inflation rates, nations across the globe have devised various strategies to navigate the complexities of inflation, each tailored to their unique economic structures and challenges. As Nigeria grapples with rising inflation rates, it’s pivotal to seek inspiration and insights from the experiences of other countries. These international models offer valuable lessons, shedding light on innovative approaches to curb inflation.

In this section, we embark on a journey to examine these diverse methods and their real-world impact.

Fiscal Discipline in Singapore

Singapore, known for its disciplined fiscal approach, has maintained a low and stable inflation rate through meticulously managed government spending, optimized taxation, and directed resources toward productivity-enhancing projects. The method has been the status quo for inflation management since its independence in 1965. This approach has contributed to the nation’s economic stability, even in the face of global economic challenges.

Inflation Trends in Singapore: As shown in Figure 3, over the years, Singapore has maintained relatively low and stable inflation rates, even amid global economic fluctuations. In recent years, inflation has been modest, with positive rates, notably 2.30% in 2021 and 6.12% in 2022. These figures indicate Singapore’s success in keeping inflation under control.

Government Spending in Singapore: Singapore’s government spending as a percentage of GDP hovers around 10%, exemplifying prudent fiscal management. This approach ensures that resources are utilized efficiently and directed toward projects that enhance productivity and economic growth. In 2020, a year marked by global economic challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore exhibited a slight increase in government spending percentage to 12.23% from 10.24% in 2019. This strategic response served to cushion the economic impact and support recovery efforts while keeping the inflation rate low and stable.

Implications for Nigeria: Nigeria, with its unique economic structure and inflation dynamics, can draw critical insights from Singapore’s fiscal discipline model. In particular, adopting a more disciplined fiscal approach can contribute to managing inflation more effectively.

Government Spending in Nigeria: As shown in Figure 4, Nigeria’s government spending as a percentage of GDP has ranged between 0.95% and 9.45% in recent years. Nigeria’s spending is much more volatile than that of Singapore. Large irregular swings in govt spending in injection into and withdrawal from the economy, can have far reaching effect on the inflation levels. These irregularities reflect the need for improved fiscal discipline. By scrutinizing government spending, optimizing taxation, and channeling resources towards productivity-enhancing projects, Nigeria can emulate the successful Singaporean model to improve its production base and tackle the low-supply-induced inflation that is typical of Nigeria.

Recommendation for Nigeria: To address inflation effectively, Nigeria should consider implementing a more disciplined fiscal approach akin to Singapore’s model. This includes a rigorous examination of government spending, optimizing taxation, and directing resources toward projects that enhance productivity. Such measures can not only contribute to inflation control but also foster sustainable economic growth and stability.

India: Inflation Targeting

Inflation management in India took a similar step as in Nigeria. In face of surging inflation, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also adopts a tightening monetary policy stance: increasing MPR and Case Reserve Ratio (CRR). The monetary authority however stepped up the game with the adoption of inflation targeting in 2016, after it was presented by the Urjit Patel Committee set up by the RBI in 2014.The inflation target was set at 4% with a tolerance range of +/- 2 percentage points, meaning that the acceptable inflation range was 2% to 6%. Some of the benefits of inflation targeting includes:

•   Clear policy objectives
•  Ensures central banks are accountable for policy actions
•  Ensures stable prices
•  Reduces economic uncertainty
•  Helps in managing people’s inflation expectations; reducing rate inflationary pressure in the medium term
• Builds trust and credibility in policy actions
•   Helps to avoid long-term inflationary pressures

Inflation targeting helps to keep the monetary authority on its active in achieving its mandate of moderate inflation and stable growth, it also helps in managing people’s inflation expectations. In most literature, it is recognized that expectations mirror the actual inflation rate; when expectations are reduced, the level of actual inflation rate too will be reduced.

Figure 5 below, shows the level of inflation rate in the country before and after the adoption of the Inflation Targeting policy in 2016. In the early 2010, inflation rate was as high as 12.5% in 2010 and 11.06% in 2013. Inflation expectations was in double-digits. From 2014, when the strategy was first presented. Drastic decline was recorded onward as inflation dropped from 11.06% in 2013 to under 5% from 2015 and has been under 7% since then in the country. Inflation expectations also reduced significantly from the initial double-digit value to single-digit.

From 2016, the Reserve Bank has been able to keep inflation rate below the target rate. It first shot outside the rage in 2020 during the COVID-19 period but fell within the range again in the following year. The increase in this year can be attributed to the supply chain disruption that was reality during the COVID-19 era which resulted in global food scarcity and surge in general price level.

Also evident in Figure 5 is the mirror relation of expectations of inflation rate and actual inflation rate. The inflation expectation in Figure 5 are 1-Year ahead, meaning that the expectation value of 8.5% in 2017 was estimated in 2016. The drop in expectation from 2016 for 2017 lead to decline in the actual inflation in 2017 from the level of 2016.

Recommendations: Designing a Course for Nigeria’s Inflation Management

In contemplating the future of Nigeria’s economic stability, it is imperative to recognize the urgency for change. While traditional methods have played their role, the evolving landscape calls for a shift towards innovative strategies. Here are key recommendations to chart Nigeria’s course towards a more resilient inflation management framework:

• Incorporating Inflation Targeting: India story showed that inflation targeting strategy helps in reducing inflationary pressure in the economy. With set levels of inflation rate, people can have a set range of inflation expectations which will reduce uncertainty and make planning more effective and resilient. It also makes the CBN price stability mandate actionable and measurable.
•  Institute Disciplined Fiscal Measures: Singapore’s disciplined fiscal approach provides a compelling model for Nigeria. By scrutinizing government spending, optimizing taxation, and directing resources towards productivity-enhancing projects, Nigeria can fortify its economic foundations. This approach not only aids in curbing inflation but also fosters sustained economic growth.
• Employ a Balanced Monetary Policy: While innovative methods hold promise, traditional monetary policy tools remain crucial. The Central Bank of Nigeria should continue its vigilant oversight, adjusting interest rates and liquidity measures judiciously to complement the broader inflation management strategy.
• Continual Monitoring and Adaptation: The landscape of inflation management is dynamic, requiring continuous vigilance and adaptation. Nigeria’s policymakers must remain attuned to changing economic conditions and be ready to refine strategies as needed.

In conclusion, this article underscores the critical need for Nigeria to revamp its inflation management strategies. By blending insights from traditional approaches with innovative strategies, Nigeria can chart a course toward sustained and enduring economic prosperity. The future holds promise, and Nigeria’s adoption of these innovative methods reflects its unwavering commitment to achieving enduring economic stability. The time for change has arrived, and Nigeria’s economic success hinges on its willingness to embrace novel approaches to inflation management.